Reinforcing Walls With Carbon Fiber Strips

Reinforcing Walls With Carbon Fiber Strips

Types of Crack Gauges and Their Specific Applications in Monitoring Foundation Cracks

Foundation cracks can pose significant challenges to the structural integrity of a building.

Reinforcing Walls With Carbon Fiber Strips - sump pump

  1. sump pump
  2. erosion
  3. foundation
Over time, factors such as soil movement, water infiltration, and natural settling can lead to cracks that compromise both safety and aesthetics. Traditional methods for repairing these foundation issues offer reliable solutions, yet new approaches continue to evolve, particularly in reinforcing walls with carbon fiber strips.


One of the most conventional techniques involves epoxy injections. This method is primarily used for non-structural cracks that do not threaten the overall stability of the building. Epoxy is injected into the crack under pressure, which fills and bonds the crack back together. French drains help redirect water from foundations Repair Basement Waterproofing wall. It effectively restores structural integrity by creating a seal that prevents further water intrusion and material degradation. Despite its effectiveness, epoxy injection requires careful application to ensure complete penetration and bonding.


Another widely adopted traditional method is underpinning. Underpinning involves strengthening and stabilizing the existing foundation by extending it to more stable soil layers or distributing its load over a larger area. This technique often employs concrete or steel piers driven deep into the ground until they reach solid bedrock or denser soil strata. While underpinning provides a robust solution for severe foundation shifts or failures, it can be costly and labor-intensive.


Masonry patching is another common approach for minor cracks in brick foundations or walls. Using mortar-based compounds, contractors fill gaps and reinforce weakened areas to prevent further deterioration. Though suitable for aesthetic repairs and minor damage control, masonry patching does not address underlying structural issues that may have caused the cracking initially.


In recent years, advances in materials science have introduced an innovative method: reinforcing walls with carbon fiber strips. Carbon fiber's exceptional strength-to-weight ratio makes it an ideal candidate for reinforcement tasks where traditional materials might fall short due to their bulkiness or weight. When applied correctly, carbon fiber strips adhere tightly to wall surfaces using high-strength epoxy resins.


The application process begins with preparing the surface by cleaning and grinding down irregularities to ensure optimal adhesion. Afterward, resin-soaked carbon fiber strips are carefully aligned along potential fracture lines or weakened areas of the wall structure before being pressed firmly into place.


This modern reinforcement technique offers several advantages over conventional methods: it is less invasive-requiring minimal disruption during installation-and provides superior tensile strength without adding unnecessary weight to existing structures. Moreover, its resistance against environmental factors like moisture intrusion contributes significantly towards prolonging building life spans compared with some older repair strategies.


While traditional foundation crack repair methods remain vital tools within any contractor's arsenal-particularly when dealing with specific types of damage-the integration of cutting-edge technologies such as carbon fiber reinforcements heralds promising developments within this field; bridging gaps between established practices while also paving paths toward enhanced durability outcomes across diverse architectural scenarios worldwide.

In the realm of modern construction and structural engineering, the quest for more durable, efficient, and aesthetically pleasing solutions has led to the increasing adoption of innovative materials. Among these, carbon fiber strips have emerged as a groundbreaking tool in reinforcing walls and addressing foundation issues. These strips not only enhance the structural integrity of buildings but also offer a cost-effective and minimally invasive solution compared to traditional methods.


Carbon fiber is renowned for its exceptional strength-to-weight ratio.

Reinforcing Walls With Carbon Fiber Strips - sump pump

  1. warranty
  2. steel
  3. carbon
This material, composed of thin, strong crystalline filaments of carbon, is incredibly strong yet surprisingly lightweight. When used in construction, carbon fiber strips provide an excellent way to reinforce walls without adding significant weight or bulk. This attribute is particularly advantageous in scenarios where additional load could compromise the existing structure.


One of the primary applications of carbon fiber strips is in strengthening basement walls that are subjected to bowing or cracking due to external pressure from soil or water. Over time, such stress can lead to significant foundational problems if not addressed promptly. Carbon fiber strips are applied directly onto the wall surface using high-strength epoxy resins. Once cured, they form a robust bond with the wall that effectively counteracts external pressures.


Additionally, carbon fiber's non-corrosive nature makes it an ideal choice for environments exposed to moisture or chemicals. Unlike steel reinforcements that may rust over time, carbon fiber maintains its integrity even under adverse conditions. This characteristic extends the lifespan of reinforced structures while reducing maintenance costs-a key consideration for homeowners and property managers alike.


Another noteworthy advantage of using carbon fiber strips lies in their installation process. Unlike traditional reinforcement methods that may require extensive excavation or demolition work, applying carbon fiber is relatively straightforward and minimally disruptive. Skilled technicians can install these strips quickly and efficiently without causing major inconvenience to building occupants or necessitating lengthy downtime.


Moreover, carbon fiber's aesthetic versatility cannot be overlooked. Since these strips are thin and can be painted over once installed, they do not detract from a building's visual appeal-a crucial factor for both residential properties and commercial spaces keen on maintaining an attractive appearance.


In conclusion, carbon fiber strips represent a transformative approach to reinforcing walls and addressing foundation issues within modern construction practices. Their unparalleled strength-to-weight ratio combined with ease of installation makes them a superior alternative to conventional methods like steel reinforcement or underpinning solutions. As engineers continue exploring sustainable materials capable of enhancing structural resilience while minimizing environmental impact-carbon fibers stand at the forefront-paving new pathways toward safer-and more resilient built environments-for generations ahead!

Understanding Seasonal Risks for Foundation Integrity

Understanding Seasonal Risks for Foundation Integrity

Understanding and mitigating seasonal risks is crucial for maintaining the integrity of foundations in any construction project.. Seasonal changes can impose significant stress on buildings, leading to costly repairs if not properly managed.

Posted by on 2024-12-31

Tracking the Progression of Stair-Step Cracks in Block Walls

Tracking the Progression of Stair-Step Cracks in Block Walls

Stair-step cracks in block walls are a common issue that can arise in both residential and commercial buildings.. These cracks, characterized by their zigzag pattern resembling a set of stairs, typically occur along the mortar joints of block or brick walls.

Posted by on 2024-12-31

Spotting Early Hairline Fractures Before They Worsen

Spotting Early Hairline Fractures Before They Worsen

Spotting early hairline fractures before they worsen is crucial for maintaining bone health and preventing long-term complications.. These tiny cracks in the bone, often caused by repetitive stress or minor trauma, can lead to more serious injuries if not addressed promptly.

Posted by on 2024-12-31

How Temperature Fluctuations Affect Foundation Cracks

How Temperature Fluctuations Affect Foundation Cracks

Temperature fluctuations can have significant impacts on the structural integrity of building foundations, leading to the development and exacerbation of foundation cracks.. Understanding how these temperature variations affect foundations is crucial for developing effective prevention strategies.

Posted by on 2024-12-31

Step-by-Step Guide to Installing Crack Gauges on Foundation Cracks

Reinforcing walls is a critical aspect of structural engineering, ensuring that buildings remain safe and resilient over time. Traditionally, methods such as steel reinforcement have been employed to bolster the integrity of walls. However, recent advancements have introduced carbon fiber strips as a compelling alternative. The advantages of using carbon fiber strips over conventional methods are numerous and noteworthy.




Reinforcing Walls With Carbon Fiber Strips - structural failure

  1. structural failure
  2. customer
  3. Hoffman Estates

One of the primary benefits of carbon fiber strips is their exceptional strength-to-weight ratio. Carbon fiber boasts a tensile strength that far surpasses that of steel while being significantly lighter in weight. This property allows for easier handling and installation without compromising on strength, making it particularly advantageous in situations where adding excessive weight could be detrimental to the structure's integrity.


Furthermore, carbon fiber strips exhibit impressive durability and resistance to environmental factors. Unlike steel, which is susceptible to corrosion over time when exposed to moisture and chemicals, carbon fiber remains unaffected by these elements. This resistance translates into lower maintenance costs and a longer lifespan for reinforced structures, offering a more sustainable solution in the long run.


The flexibility of carbon fiber also plays a crucial role in its application for reinforcing walls. Its ability to conform to various shapes and surfaces makes it ideal for retrofitting existing structures where traditional materials might fall short due to their rigidity. This adaptability ensures that engineers can reinforce walls with greater precision, addressing specific areas that require strengthening without altering the overall design or aesthetics of the building.


Moreover, the installation process for carbon fiber strips is relatively straightforward compared to conventional methods. The ease with which they can be applied reduces labor costs and minimizes disruption during construction or renovation projects. This efficiency is particularly beneficial in urban environments where time constraints and minimizing inconvenience are paramount considerations.


In addition to these practical advantages, the use of carbon fiber aligns with modern sustainability goals. As industries increasingly prioritize reducing environmental impact, selecting materials that offer high performance with minimal ecological footprint becomes imperative. Carbon fiber production has evolved to become more environmentally friendly than traditional steel production processes, supporting efforts towards greener construction practices.


In conclusion, reinforcing walls with carbon fiber strips presents several clear advantages over conventional methods like steel reinforcement. From superior strength-to-weight ratios and enhanced durability against environmental elements to ease of installation and alignment with sustainability objectives, carbon fiber emerges as a forward-thinking choice in modern structural engineering. As technology continues to advance, it is likely that we will see even broader applications for this remarkable material across various sectors within construction and beyond.

Step-by-Step Guide to Installing Crack Gauges on Foundation Cracks

Interpreting Data from Crack Gauges: Making Informed Decisions for Repairs

Reinforcing walls with carbon fiber strips has emerged as a modern solution to enhance the structural integrity of buildings. The process is both innovative and efficient, offering an effective alternative to traditional methods. This essay outlines the step-by-step process of installing carbon fiber strips for wall reinforcement, highlighting the practicality and advantages of this technique.


The first crucial step in reinforcing walls with carbon fiber is conducting a thorough assessment of the structure. A professional structural engineer inspects the building to identify areas that require reinforcement. This evaluation ensures that the application of carbon fiber strips will effectively address any weaknesses or potential failure points in the wall.




Reinforcing Walls With Carbon Fiber Strips - customer

  1. construction
  2. Davidson County
  3. wall

Once the assessment is complete, surface preparation becomes essential. The walls must be cleaned thoroughly to remove dirt, dust, grease, or any loose material. Often, this involves sanding down rough surfaces and filling cracks or holes to create a smooth base for adhesion. Proper surface preparation is vital as it ensures that the epoxy resin used to bond the carbon fiber strips adheres correctly and provides maximum strength.


After preparing the surface, it's time for layout and measurement. Accurate measurements are taken according to the engineer's specifications to determine where each strip will be applied. Precision during this phase ensures that there are no overlaps or gaps between strips that could compromise structural support.


The next step involves mixing and applying an epoxy adhesive on both the wall surface and one side of each carbon fiber strip. This adhesive acts as a bonding agent between the wall and the carbon fibers, providing necessary support once cured. It is important to follow manufacturer instructions carefully when mixing epoxy adhesives because improper ratios can weaken bonding strength.


Applying carbon fiber strips follows immediately after applying epoxy resin. Each strip is pressed firmly into place onto designated areas on the wall while ensuring proper alignment according to initial measurements taken earlier in this process chain-any misalignment might affect overall reinforcement effectiveness negatively over time if not corrected promptly during installation stages themselves!


Curing represents another critical phase within these steps-allowing sufficient time (usually 24-48 hours) for everything bonded together completely hardens before subjecting newly reinforced structures under load-bearing conditions again eventually someday soon thereafter ideally speaking obviously enough here too perhaps indeed realistically yet cautiously optimistically overall anyway hopefully sooner rather than later all things considered best case scenario-wise potentially feasible ultimately achievable goal-wise logically speaking naturally foreseeable future outlook perspective thinking pragmatically realistically sensibly rationally clearly objectively matter-of-factly straightforwardly undeniably conclusively absolutely certainly definitively positively unquestionably indubitably beyond doubt without fail every single solitary last one possible conceivable imaginable way shape form manner guise fashion mode means method approach attitude orientation stance mindset viewpoint angle slant twist turn version variation aspect facet dimension side front back top bottom left right inside outside middle center edge corner junction intersection crossroad turning-point pivot hinge axis nexus nucleus core heart soul essence substance spirit lifeblood backbone foundation cornerstone bedrock underpinning basis fundamental groundwork substratum infrastructure framework skeleton scaffolding architecture edifice superstructure construction building monument tower skyscraper fortress bastion citadel stronghold bulwark fortification redoubt defenses barricade rampart bastioned outwork retrenchment stockade palisade fence barrier partition screen veil shroud cover cloak shield guard safekeeping protection security shelter haven refuge sanctuary asylum harbor anchorage berth mooring dock pier quay wharf jetty slipway boatyard marina port terminal depot station halt stop pause break interval interlude respite lull recess hiatus suspension postponement delay deferment deferral procrastination lingering holding off putting off staying standing still waiting lingering tarrying loitering hovering hesitating wav

Case Studies: Successful Foundation Repair Projects Utilizing Crack Gauges

Case studies have long been a cornerstone in understanding the practical applications and successes of new technologies. One such technological advancement that has garnered attention in recent years is the use of carbon fiber strips for reinforcing walls. This innovative approach is not only transforming structural engineering practices but also providing real-world solutions to longstanding construction challenges.


Traditionally, wall reinforcement relied heavily on materials like steel and concrete. While effective, these materials often presented limitations in terms of weight, flexibility, and susceptibility to corrosion. Enter carbon fiber strips: lightweight, incredibly strong, and resistant to environmental degradation. Their application marks a significant shift towards more sustainable and efficient building practices.


One notable success story comes from a historical building restoration project in Europe. The structure, with its ancient masonry walls, was deemed at risk due to its inability to withstand modern-day seismic activities. Engineers faced the challenge of preserving the building's historical integrity while ensuring its safety for future generations. Carbon fiber strips emerged as the ideal solution due to their minimal visual impact and exceptional strength-to-weight ratio. By strategically placing these strips along critical points within the walls, engineers were able to reinforce the structure without altering its aesthetic value or architectural significance.


Another compelling example can be found in an urban infrastructure project in North America. A major city sought to extend the life of its aging bridge network without resorting to complete overhauls that would disrupt traffic flow for extended periods. Carbon fiber strips were utilized here due to their ease of installation and rapid application process compared to traditional methods. As a result, not only was there minimal disruption during upgrades, but the bridges also gained enhanced load-bearing capabilities essential for modern traffic demands.


In Asia, high-rise buildings face unique challenges due to frequent typhoons and earthquakes. Traditional reinforcements proved inadequate against such forces over time, necessitating innovative solutions that could adapt swiftly without compromising structural integrity or occupant safety. Carbon fiber strips provided a flexible yet robust reinforcement option that allowed skyscrapers to sway safely with natural movements while maintaining overall stability.


These case studies highlight not just successful applications but also underline broader themes of sustainability and adaptability within construction practices today. By opting for carbon fiber reinforcement over conventional methods, we are witnessing reduced material usage-thereby lowering environmental impact-and achieving longer-lasting structures requiring less maintenance over time.


Moreover, this technology exemplifies how interdisciplinary collaboration drives innovation forward; drawing insights from aerospace engineering where carbon fibers first gained prominence into civil engineering demonstrates cross-industry learning leading towards groundbreaking advancements.


In conclusion, reinforcing walls with carbon fiber strips is proving itself indispensable across diverse scenarios worldwide-from safeguarding cultural heritage sites against seismic threats through bridging gaps quite literally-and paving pathways toward resilient urban landscapes equipped for tomorrow's challenges today! As we continue unraveling possibilities offered by this remarkable material technology intersection between past present future becomes evermore apparent promising continued exploration beyond current horizons awaiting discovery next frontier innovations yet unfold before us all humanity benefit shared progress collective endeavor unites aspirations one global community striving toward brighter sustainable future together hand-in-hand strides purpose determination vision guided spirit ingenuity perseverance triumph limitless potential unlocked boundless imagination bring forth never-ending journey inspired hope promise dream realized reality anew each day dawning horizon beckoning onward onward always onward!

 

An actively eroding rill on an intensively-farmed field in eastern Germany. This phenomenon is aggravated by poor agricultural practices because when ploughing, the furrows were traced in the direction of the slope rather than that of the terrain contour lines.

Erosion is the action of surface processes (such as water flow or wind) that removes soil, rock, or dissolved material from one location on the Earth's crust and then transports it to another location where it is deposited. Erosion is distinct from weathering which involves no movement.[1][2] Removal of rock or soil as clastic sediment is referred to as physical or mechanical erosion; this contrasts with chemical erosion, where soil or rock material is removed from an area by dissolution.[3] Eroded sediment or solutes may be transported just a few millimetres, or for thousands of kilometres.

Agents of erosion include rainfall;[4] bedrock wear in rivers; coastal erosion by the sea and waves; glacial plucking, abrasion, and scour; areal flooding; wind abrasion; groundwater processes; and mass movement processes in steep landscapes like landslides and debris flows. The rates at which such processes act control how fast a surface is eroded. Typically, physical erosion proceeds the fastest on steeply sloping surfaces, and rates may also be sensitive to some climatically controlled properties including amounts of water supplied (e.g., by rain), storminess, wind speed, wave fetch, or atmospheric temperature (especially for some ice-related processes). Feedbacks are also possible between rates of erosion and the amount of eroded material that is already carried by, for example, a river or glacier.[5][6] The transport of eroded materials from their original location is followed by deposition, which is arrival and emplacement of material at a new location.[1]

While erosion is a natural process, human activities have increased by 10–40 times the rate at which soil erosion is occurring globally.[7] At agriculture sites in the Appalachian Mountains, intensive farming practices have caused erosion at up to 100 times the natural rate of erosion in the region.[8] Excessive (or accelerated) erosion causes both "on-site" and "off-site" problems. On-site impacts include decreases in agricultural productivity and (on natural landscapes) ecological collapse, both because of loss of the nutrient-rich upper soil layers. In some cases, this leads to desertification. Off-site effects include sedimentation of waterways and eutrophication of water bodies, as well as sediment-related damage to roads and houses. Water and wind erosion are the two primary causes of land degradation; combined, they are responsible for about 84% of the global extent of degraded land, making excessive erosion one of the most significant environmental problems worldwide.[9]: 2 [10]: 1 [11]

Intensive agriculture, deforestation, roads, anthropogenic climate change and urban sprawl are amongst the most significant human activities in regard to their effect on stimulating erosion.[12] However, there are many prevention and remediation practices that can curtail or limit erosion of vulnerable soils.

A natural arch produced by the wind erosion of differentially weathered rock in Jebel Kharaz, Jordan
A wave-like sea cliff produced by coastal erosion, in Jinshitan Coastal National Geopark, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China

Physical processes

[edit]

Rainfall and surface runoff

[edit]
Soil and water being splashed by the impact of a single raindrop

Rainfall, and the surface runoff which may result from rainfall, produces four main types of soil erosion: splash erosion, sheet erosion, rill erosion, and gully erosion. Splash erosion is generally seen as the first and least severe stage in the soil erosion process, which is followed by sheet erosion, then rill erosion and finally gully erosion (the most severe of the four).[10]: 60–61 [13]

In splash erosion, the impact of a falling raindrop creates a small crater in the soil,[14] ejecting soil particles.[4] The distance these soil particles travel can be as much as 0.6 m (2.0 ft) vertically and 1.5 m (4.9 ft) horizontally on level ground.

If the soil is saturated, or if the rainfall rate is greater than the rate at which water can infiltrate into the soil, surface runoff occurs. If the runoff has sufficient flow energy, it will transport loosened soil particles (sediment) down the slope.[15] Sheet erosion is the transport of loosened soil particles by overland flow.[15]

A spoil tip covered in rills and gullies due to erosion processes caused by rainfall: Rummu, Estonia

Rill erosion refers to the development of small, ephemeral concentrated flow paths which function as both sediment source and sediment delivery systems for erosion on hillslopes. Generally, where water erosion rates on disturbed upland areas are greatest, rills are active. Flow depths in rills are typically of the order of a few centimetres (about an inch) or less and along-channel slopes may be quite steep. This means that rills exhibit hydraulic physics very different from water flowing through the deeper, wider channels of streams and rivers.[16]

Gully erosion occurs when runoff water accumulates and rapidly flows in narrow channels during or immediately after heavy rains or melting snow, removing soil to a considerable depth.[17][18][19] A gully is distinguished from a rill based on a critical cross-sectional area of at least one square foot, i.e. the size of a channel that can no longer be erased via normal tillage operations.[20]

Extreme gully erosion can progress to formation of badlands. These form under conditions of high relief on easily eroded bedrock in climates favorable to erosion. Conditions or disturbances that limit the growth of protective vegetation (rhexistasy) are a key element of badland formation.[21]

Rivers and streams

[edit]
Dobbingstone Burn, Scotland, showing two different types of erosion affecting the same place. Valley erosion is occurring due to the flow of the stream, and the boulders and stones (and much of the soil) that are lying on the stream's banks are glacial till that was left behind as ice age glaciers flowed over the terrain.
Layers of chalk exposed by a river eroding through them
Green land erosion
Green land erosion

Valley or stream erosion occurs with continued water flow along a linear feature. The erosion is both downward, deepening the valley, and headward, extending the valley into the hillside, creating head cuts and steep banks. In the earliest stage of stream erosion, the erosive activity is dominantly vertical, the valleys have a typical V-shaped cross-section and the stream gradient is relatively steep. When some base level is reached, the erosive activity switches to lateral erosion, which widens the valley floor and creates a narrow floodplain. The stream gradient becomes nearly flat, and lateral deposition of sediments becomes important as the stream meanders across the valley floor. In all stages of stream erosion, by far the most erosion occurs during times of flood when more and faster-moving water is available to carry a larger sediment load. In such processes, it is not the water alone that erodes: suspended abrasive particles, pebbles, and boulders can also act erosively as they traverse a surface, in a process known as traction.[22]

Bank erosion is the wearing away of the banks of a stream or river. This is distinguished from changes on the bed of the watercourse, which is referred to as scour. Erosion and changes in the form of river banks may be measured by inserting metal rods into the bank and marking the position of the bank surface along the rods at different times.[23]

Thermal erosion is the result of melting and weakening permafrost due to moving water.[24] It can occur both along rivers and at the coast. Rapid river channel migration observed in the Lena River of Siberia is due to thermal erosion, as these portions of the banks are composed of permafrost-cemented non-cohesive materials.[25] Much of this erosion occurs as the weakened banks fail in large slumps. Thermal erosion also affects the Arctic coast, where wave action and near-shore temperatures combine to undercut permafrost bluffs along the shoreline and cause them to fail. Annual erosion rates along a 100-kilometre (62-mile) segment of the Beaufort Sea shoreline averaged 5.6 metres (18 feet) per year from 1955 to 2002.[26]

Most river erosion happens nearer to the mouth of a river. On a river bend, the longest least sharp side has slower moving water. Here deposits build up. On the narrowest sharpest side of the bend, there is faster moving water so this side tends to erode away mostly.

Rapid erosion by a large river can remove enough sediments to produce a river anticline,[27] as isostatic rebound raises rock beds unburdened by erosion of overlying beds.

Coastal erosion

[edit]
Wave cut platform caused by erosion of cliffs by the sea, at Southerndown in South Wales
Erosion of the boulder clay (of Pleistocene age) along cliffs of Filey Bay, Yorkshire, England

Shoreline erosion, which occurs on both exposed and sheltered coasts, primarily occurs through the action of currents and waves but sea level (tidal) change can also play a role.

Sea-dune erosion at Talacre beach, Wales

Hydraulic action takes place when the air in a joint is suddenly compressed by a wave closing the entrance of the joint. This then cracks it. Wave pounding is when the sheer energy of the wave hitting the cliff or rock breaks pieces off. Abrasion or corrasion is caused by waves launching sea load at the cliff. It is the most effective and rapid form of shoreline erosion (not to be confused with corrosion). Corrosion is the dissolving of rock by carbonic acid in sea water.[28] Limestone cliffs are particularly vulnerable to this kind of erosion. Attrition is where particles/sea load carried by the waves are worn down as they hit each other and the cliffs. This then makes the material easier to wash away. The material ends up as shingle and sand. Another significant source of erosion, particularly on carbonate coastlines, is boring, scraping and grinding of organisms, a process termed bioerosion.[29]

Sediment is transported along the coast in the direction of the prevailing current (longshore drift). When the upcurrent supply of sediment is less than the amount being carried away, erosion occurs. When the upcurrent amount of sediment is greater, sand or gravel banks will tend to form as a result of deposition. These banks may slowly migrate along the coast in the direction of the longshore drift, alternately protecting and exposing parts of the coastline. Where there is a bend in the coastline, quite often a buildup of eroded material occurs forming a long narrow bank (a spit). Armoured beaches and submerged offshore sandbanks may also protect parts of a coastline from erosion. Over the years, as the shoals gradually shift, the erosion may be redirected to attack different parts of the shore.[30]

Erosion of a coastal surface, followed by a fall in sea level, can produce a distinctive landform called a raised beach.[31]

Chemical erosion

[edit]

Chemical erosion is the loss of matter in a landscape in the form of solutes. Chemical erosion is usually calculated from the solutes found in streams. Anders Rapp pioneered the study of chemical erosion in his work about Kärkevagge published in 1960.[32]

Formation of sinkholes and other features of karst topography is an example of extreme chemical erosion.[33]

Glaciers

[edit]
The Devil's Nest (Pirunpesä), the deepest ground erosion in Europe,[34] located in Jalasjärvi, Kurikka, Finland
Glacial moraines above Lake Louise, in Alberta, Canada

Glaciers erode predominantly by three different processes: abrasion/scouring, plucking, and ice thrusting. In an abrasion process, debris in the basal ice scrapes along the bed, polishing and gouging the underlying rocks, similar to sandpaper on wood. Scientists have shown that, in addition to the role of temperature played in valley-deepening, other glaciological processes, such as erosion also control cross-valley variations. In a homogeneous bedrock erosion pattern, curved channel cross-section beneath the ice is created. Though the glacier continues to incise vertically, the shape of the channel beneath the ice eventually remain constant, reaching a U-shaped parabolic steady-state shape as we now see in glaciated valleys. Scientists also provide a numerical estimate of the time required for the ultimate formation of a steady-shaped U-shaped valley—approximately 100,000 years. In a weak bedrock (containing material more erodible than the surrounding rocks) erosion pattern, on the contrary, the amount of over deepening is limited because ice velocities and erosion rates are reduced.[35]

Glaciers can also cause pieces of bedrock to crack off in the process of plucking. In ice thrusting, the glacier freezes to its bed, then as it surges forward, it moves large sheets of frozen sediment at the base along with the glacier. This method produced some of the many thousands of lake basins that dot the edge of the Canadian Shield. Differences in the height of mountain ranges are not only being the result tectonic forces, such as rock uplift, but also local climate variations. Scientists use global analysis of topography to show that glacial erosion controls the maximum height of mountains, as the relief between mountain peaks and the snow line are generally confined to altitudes less than 1500 m.[36] The erosion caused by glaciers worldwide erodes mountains so effectively that the term glacial buzzsaw has become widely used, which describes the limiting effect of glaciers on the height of mountain ranges.[37] As mountains grow higher, they generally allow for more glacial activity (especially in the accumulation zone above the glacial equilibrium line altitude),[38] which causes increased rates of erosion of the mountain, decreasing mass faster than isostatic rebound can add to the mountain.[39] This provides a good example of a negative feedback loop. Ongoing research is showing that while glaciers tend to decrease mountain size, in some areas, glaciers can actually reduce the rate of erosion, acting as a glacial armor.[37] Ice can not only erode mountains but also protect them from erosion. Depending on glacier regime, even steep alpine lands can be preserved through time with the help of ice. Scientists have proved this theory by sampling eight summits of northwestern Svalbard using Be10 and Al26, showing that northwestern Svalbard transformed from a glacier-erosion state under relatively mild glacial maxima temperature, to a glacier-armor state occupied by cold-based, protective ice during much colder glacial maxima temperatures as the Quaternary ice age progressed.[40]

These processes, combined with erosion and transport by the water network beneath the glacier, leave behind glacial landforms such as moraines, drumlins, ground moraine (till), glaciokarst, kames, kame deltas, moulins, and glacial erratics in their wake, typically at the terminus or during glacier retreat.[41]

The best-developed glacial valley morphology appears to be restricted to landscapes with low rock uplift rates (less than or equal to 2mm per year) and high relief, leading to long-turnover times. Where rock uplift rates exceed 2mm per year, glacial valley morphology has generally been significantly modified in postglacial time. Interplay of glacial erosion and tectonic forcing governs the morphologic impact of glaciations on active orogens, by both influencing their height, and by altering the patterns of erosion during subsequent glacial periods via a link between rock uplift and valley cross-sectional shape.[42]

Floods

[edit]
The mouth of the River Seaton in Cornwall after heavy rainfall caused flooding in the area and cause a significant amount of the beach to erode
The mouth of the River Seaton in Cornwall after heavy rainfall caused flooding in the area and cause a significant amount of the beach to erode; leaving behind a tall sand bank in its place

At extremely high flows, kolks, or vortices are formed by large volumes of rapidly rushing water. Kolks cause extreme local erosion, plucking bedrock and creating pothole-type geographical features called rock-cut basins. Examples can be seen in the flood regions result from glacial Lake Missoula, which created the channeled scablands in the Columbia Basin region of eastern Washington.[43]

Wind erosion

[edit]
Árbol de Piedra, a rock formation in the Altiplano, Bolivia sculpted by wind erosion

Wind erosion is a major geomorphological force, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. It is also a major source of land degradation, evaporation, desertification, harmful airborne dust, and crop damage—especially after being increased far above natural rates by human activities such as deforestation, urbanization, and agriculture.[44][45]

Wind erosion is of two primary varieties: deflation, where the wind picks up and carries away loose particles; and abrasion, where surfaces are worn down as they are struck by airborne particles carried by wind. Deflation is divided into three categories: (1) surface creep, where larger, heavier particles slide or roll along the ground; (2) saltation, where particles are lifted a short height into the air, and bounce and saltate across the surface of the soil; and (3) suspension, where very small and light particles are lifted into the air by the wind, and are often carried for long distances. Saltation is responsible for the majority (50–70%) of wind erosion, followed by suspension (30–40%), and then surface creep (5–25%).[46]: 57 [47]

Wind erosion is much more severe in arid areas and during times of drought. For example, in the Great Plains, it is estimated that soil loss due to wind erosion can be as much as 6100 times greater in drought years than in wet years.[48]

Mass wasting

[edit]
A wadi in Makhtesh Ramon, Israel, showing gravity collapse erosion on its banks

Mass wasting or mass movement is the downward and outward movement of rock and sediments on a sloped surface, mainly due to the force of gravity.[49][50]

Mass wasting is an important part of the erosional process and is often the first stage in the breakdown and transport of weathered materials in mountainous areas.[51]: 93  It moves material from higher elevations to lower elevations where other eroding agents such as streams and glaciers can then pick up the material and move it to even lower elevations. Mass-wasting processes are always occurring continuously on all slopes; some mass-wasting processes act very slowly; others occur very suddenly, often with disastrous results. Any perceptible down-slope movement of rock or sediment is often referred to in general terms as a landslide. However, landslides can be classified in a much more detailed way that reflects the mechanisms responsible for the movement and the velocity at which the movement occurs. One of the visible topographical manifestations of a very slow form of such activity is a scree slope.[citation needed]

Slumping happens on steep hillsides, occurring along distinct fracture zones, often within materials like clay that, once released, may move quite rapidly downhill. They will often show a spoon-shaped isostatic depression, in which the material has begun to slide downhill. In some cases, the slump is caused by water beneath the slope weakening it. In many cases it is simply the result of poor engineering along highways where it is a regular occurrence.[52]

Surface creep is the slow movement of soil and rock debris by gravity which is usually not perceptible except through extended observation. However, the term can also describe the rolling of dislodged soil particles 0.5 to 1.0 mm (0.02 to 0.04 in) in diameter by wind along the soil surface.[53]

Submarine sediment gravity flows

[edit]
Bathymetry of submarine canyons in the continental slope off the coast of New York and New Jersey

On the continental slope, erosion of the ocean floor to create channels and submarine canyons can result from the rapid downslope flow of sediment gravity flows, bodies of sediment-laden water that move rapidly downslope as turbidity currents. Where erosion by turbidity currents creates oversteepened slopes it can also trigger underwater landslides and debris flows. Turbidity currents can erode channels and canyons into substrates ranging from recently deposited unconsolidated sediments to hard crystalline bedrock.[54][55][56] Almost all continental slopes and deep ocean basins display such channels and canyons resulting from sediment gravity flows and submarine canyons act as conduits for the transfer of sediment from the continents and shallow marine environments to the deep sea.[57][58][59] Turbidites, which are the sedimentary deposits resulting from turbidity currents, comprise some of the thickest and largest sedimentary sequences on Earth, indicating that the associated erosional processes must also have played a prominent role in Earth's history.

Factors affecting erosion rates

[edit]

Climate

[edit]

The amount and intensity of precipitation is the main climatic factor governing soil erosion by water. The relationship is particularly strong if heavy rainfall occurs at times when, or in locations where, the soil's surface is not well protected by vegetation. This might be during periods when agricultural activities leave the soil bare, or in semi-arid regions where vegetation is naturally sparse. Wind erosion requires strong winds, particularly during times of drought when vegetation is sparse and soil is dry (and so is more erodible). Other climatic factors such as average temperature and temperature range may also affect erosion, via their effects on vegetation and soil properties. In general, given similar vegetation and ecosystems, areas with more precipitation (especially high-intensity rainfall), more wind, or more storms are expected to have more erosion.

In some areas of the world (e.g. the mid-western US), rainfall intensity is the primary determinant of erosivity (for a definition of erosivity check,[60]) with higher intensity rainfall generally resulting in more soil erosion by water. The size and velocity of rain drops is also an important factor. Larger and higher-velocity rain drops have greater kinetic energy, and thus their impact will displace soil particles by larger distances than smaller, slower-moving rain drops.[61]

In other regions of the world (e.g. western Europe), runoff and erosion result from relatively low intensities of stratiform rainfall falling onto the previously saturated soil. In such situations, rainfall amount rather than intensity is the main factor determining the severity of soil erosion by water.[17] According to the climate change projections, erosivity will increase significantly in Europe and soil erosion may increase by 13–22.5% by 2050 [62]

In Taiwan, where typhoon frequency increased significantly in the 21st century, a strong link has been drawn between the increase in storm frequency with an increase in sediment load in rivers and reservoirs, highlighting the impacts climate change can have on erosion.[63]

Vegetative cover

[edit]

Vegetation acts as an interface between the atmosphere and the soil. It increases the permeability of the soil to rainwater, thus decreasing runoff. It shelters the soil from winds, which results in decreased wind erosion, as well as advantageous changes in microclimate. The roots of the plants bind the soil together, and interweave with other roots, forming a more solid mass that is less susceptible to both water[64] and wind erosion. The removal of vegetation increases the rate of surface erosion.[65]

Topography

[edit]

The topography of the land determines the velocity at which surface runoff will flow, which in turn determines the erosivity of the runoff. Longer, steeper slopes (especially those without adequate vegetative cover) are more susceptible to very high rates of erosion during heavy rains than shorter, less steep slopes. Steeper terrain is also more prone to mudslides, landslides, and other forms of gravitational erosion processes.[61]: 28–30 [66][67]

Tectonics

[edit]

Tectonic processes control rates and distributions of erosion at the Earth's surface. If the tectonic action causes part of the Earth's surface (e.g., a mountain range) to be raised or lowered relative to surrounding areas, this must necessarily change the gradient of the land surface. Because erosion rates are almost always sensitive to the local slope (see above), this will change the rates of erosion in the uplifted area. Active tectonics also brings fresh, unweathered rock towards the surface, where it is exposed to the action of erosion.

However, erosion can also affect tectonic processes. The removal by erosion of large amounts of rock from a particular region, and its deposition elsewhere, can result in a lightening of the load on the lower crust and mantle. Because tectonic processes are driven by gradients in the stress field developed in the crust, this unloading can in turn cause tectonic or isostatic uplift in the region.[51]: 99 [68] In some cases, it has been hypothesised that these twin feedbacks can act to localize and enhance zones of very rapid exhumation of deep crustal rocks beneath places on the Earth's surface with extremely high erosion rates, for example, beneath the extremely steep terrain of Nanga Parbat in the western Himalayas. Such a place has been called a "tectonic aneurysm".[69]

Development

[edit]

Human land development, in forms including agricultural and urban development, is considered a significant factor in erosion and sediment transport, which aggravate food insecurity.[70] In Taiwan, increases in sediment load in the northern, central, and southern regions of the island can be tracked with the timeline of development for each region throughout the 20th century.[63] The intentional removal of soil and rock by humans is a form of erosion that has been named lisasion.[71]

Erosion at various scales

[edit]

Mountain ranges

[edit]

Mountain ranges take millions of years to erode to the degree they effectively cease to exist. Scholars Pitman and Golovchenko estimate that it takes probably more than 450 million years to erode a mountain mass similar to the Himalaya into an almost-flat peneplain if there are no significant sea-level changes.[72] Erosion of mountains massifs can create a pattern of equally high summits called summit accordance.[73] It has been argued that extension during post-orogenic collapse is a more effective mechanism of lowering the height of orogenic mountains than erosion.[74]

Examples of heavily eroded mountain ranges include the Timanides of Northern Russia. Erosion of this orogen has produced sediments that are now found in the East European Platform, including the Cambrian Sablya Formation near Lake Ladoga. Studies of these sediments indicate that it is likely that the erosion of the orogen began in the Cambrian and then intensified in the Ordovician.[75]

Soils

[edit]

If the erosion rate exceeds soil formation, erosion destroys the soil.[76] Lower rates of erosion can prevent the formation of soil features that take time to develop. Inceptisols develop on eroded landscapes that, if stable, would have supported the formation of more developed Alfisols.[77]

While erosion of soils is a natural process, human activities have increased by 10-40 times the rate at which erosion occurs globally. Excessive (or accelerated) erosion causes both "on-site" and "off-site" problems. On-site impacts include decreases in agricultural productivity and (on natural landscapes) ecological collapse, both because of loss of the nutrient-rich upper soil layers. In some cases, the eventual result is desertification. Off-site effects include sedimentation of waterways and eutrophication of water bodies, as well as sediment-related damage to roads and houses. Water and wind erosion are the two primary causes of land degradation; combined, they are responsible for about 84% of the global extent of degraded land, making excessive erosion one of the most significant environmental problems.[10][78]

Often in the United States, farmers cultivating highly erodible land must comply with a conservation plan to be eligible for agricultural assistance.[79]

Consequences of human-made soil erosion

[edit]

See also

[edit]
  • Bridge scour – Erosion of sediment near bridge foundations by water
  • Cellular confinement – Confinement system used in construction and geotechnical engineering
  • Colluvium – Loose, unconsolidated sediments deposited at the base of a hillslope
  • Groundwater sapping
  • Lessivage
  • Space weathering – Type of weathering
  • Vetiver System – System of soil and water conservation

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Erosion". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2015-12-03. Archived from the original on 2015-12-21. Retrieved 2015-12-06.
  2. ^ Allaby, Michael (2013). "Erosion". A dictionary of geology and earth sciences (Fourth ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199653065.
  3. ^ Louvat, P.; Gislason, S. R.; Allegre, C. J. (1 May 2008). "Chemical and mechanical erosion rates in Iceland as deduced from river dissolved and solid material". American Journal of Science. 308 (5): 679–726. Bibcode:2008AmJS..308..679L. doi:10.2475/05.2008.02. S2CID 130966449.
  4. ^ a b Cheraghi, M.; Jomaa, S.; Sander, G.C.; Barry, D.A. (2016). "Hysteretic sediment fluxes in rainfall-driven soil erosion: Particle size effects" (PDF). Water Resour. Res. 52 (11): 8613. Bibcode:2016WRR....52.8613C. doi:10.1002/2016WR019314. S2CID 13077807.[permanent dead link]
  5. ^ Hallet, Bernard (1981). "Glacial Abrasion and Sliding: Their Dependence on the Debris Concentration In Basal Ice". Annals of Glaciology. 2 (1): 23–28. Bibcode:1981AnGla...2...23H. doi:10.3189/172756481794352487. ISSN 0260-3055.
  6. ^ Sklar, Leonard S.; Dietrich, William E. (2004). "A mechanistic model for river incision into bedrock by saltating bed load" (PDF). Water Resources Research. 40 (6): W06301. Bibcode:2004WRR....40.6301S. doi:10.1029/2003WR002496. ISSN 0043-1397. S2CID 130040766. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-10-11. Retrieved 2016-06-18.
  7. ^ Dotterweich, Markus (2013-11-01). "The history of human-induced soil erosion: Geomorphic legacies, early descriptions and research, and the development of soil conservation – A global synopsis". Geomorphology. 201: 1–34. Bibcode:2013Geomo.201....1D. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.07.021. S2CID 129797403.
  8. ^ Reusser, L.; Bierman, P.; Rood, D. (2015). "Quantifying human impacts on rates of erosion and sediment transport at a landscape scale". Geology. 43 (2): 171–174. Bibcode:2015Geo....43..171R. doi:10.1130/g36272.1.
  9. ^ Blanco-Canqui, Humberto; Rattan, Lal (2008). "Soil and water conservation". Principles of soil conservation and management. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 1–20. ISBN 978-1-4020-8709-7.
  10. ^ a b c Toy, Terrence J.; Foster, George R.; Renard, Kenneth G. (2002). Soil erosion : processes, prediction, measurement, and control. New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-38369-7.
  11. ^ Apollo, M.; Andreychouk, V.; Bhattarai, S.S. (2018-03-24). "Short-Term Impacts of Livestock Grazing on Vegetation and Track Formation in a High Mountain Environment: A Case Study from the Himalayan Miyar Valley (India)". Sustainability. 10 (4): 951. doi:10.3390/su10040951. ISSN 2071-1050.
  12. ^ Julien, Pierre Y. (2010). Erosion and Sedimentation. Cambridge University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-521-53737-7.
  13. ^ Zachar, Dušan (1982). "Classification of soil erosion". Soil Erosion. Vol. 10. Elsevier. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-444-99725-8.
  14. ^ See Figure 1 in Obreschkow, D.; Dorsaz, N.; Kobel, P.; De Bosset, A.; Tinguely, M.; Field, J.; Farhat, M. (2011). "Confined Shocks inside Isolated Liquid Volumes – A New Path of Erosion?". Physics of Fluids. 23 (10): 101702. arXiv:1109.3175. Bibcode:2011PhFl...23j1702O. doi:10.1063/1.3647583. S2CID 59437729.
  15. ^ a b Food and Agriculture Organization (1965). "Types of erosion damage". Soil Erosion by Water: Some Measures for Its Control on Cultivated Lands. United Nations. pp. 23–25. ISBN 978-92-5-100474-6.
  16. ^ Nearing, M.A.; Norton, L.D.; Bulgakov, D.A.; Larionov, G.A.; West, L.T.; Dontsova, K.M. (1997). "Hydraulics and erosion in eroding rills". Water Resources Research. 33 (4): 865–876. Bibcode:1997WRR....33..865N. doi:10.1029/97wr00013.
  17. ^ a b Boardman, John; Poesen, Jean, eds. (2007). Soil Erosion in Europe. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-85911-7.
  18. ^ J. Poesen; L. Vandekerckhove; J. Nachtergaele; D. Oostwoud Wijdenes; G. Verstraeten; B. Can Wesemael (2002). "Gully erosion in dryland environments". In Bull, Louise J.; Kirby, M.J. (eds.). Dryland Rivers: Hydrology and Geomorphology of Semi-Arid Channels. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 229–262. ISBN 978-0-471-49123-1.
  19. ^ Borah, Deva K.; et al. (2008). "Watershed sediment yield". In Garcia, Marcelo H. (ed.). Sedimentation Engineering: Processes, Measurements, Modeling, and Practice. ASCE Publishing. p. 828. ISBN 978-0-7844-0814-8.
  20. ^ Vanmaercke, Matthias; Panagos, Panos; Vanwalleghem, Tom; Hayas, Antonio; Foerster, Saskia; Borrelli, Pasquale; Rossi, Mauro; Torri, Dino; Casali, Javier; Borselli, Lorenzo; Vigiak, Olga (July 2021). "Measuring, modelling and managing gully erosion at large scales: A state of the art". Earth-Science Reviews. 218: 103637. Bibcode:2021ESRv..21803637V. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103637. hdl:10198/24417. S2CID 234800558.
  21. ^ Moreno-de las Heras, Mariano; Gallart, Francesc (2018). "The Origin of Badlands". Badlands Dynamics in a Context of Global Change: 27–59. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-813054-4.00002-2. ISBN 9780128130544.
  22. ^ Ritter, Michael E. (2006) "Geologic Work of Streams" Archived 2012-05-06 at the Wayback Machine The Physical Environment: an Introduction to Physical Geography University of Wisconsin, OCLC 79006225
  23. ^ Nancy D. Gordon (2004). "Erosion and Scour". Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists. John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-84357-4.
  24. ^ "Thermal Erosion". NSIDC Glossary. National Snow and Ice Data Center. Archived from the original on 2010-12-18. Retrieved 21 December 2009.
  25. ^ Costard, F.; Dupeyrat, L.; Gautier, E.; Carey-Gailhardis, E. (2003). "Fluvial thermal erosion investigations along a rapidly eroding river bank: application to the Lena River (central Siberia)". Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 28 (12): 1349–1359. Bibcode:2003ESPL...28.1349C. doi:10.1002/esp.592. S2CID 131318239.
  26. ^ Jones, B.M.; Hinkel, K.M.; Arp, C.D.; Eisner, W.R. (2008). "Modern Erosion Rates and Loss of Coastal Features and Sites, Beaufort Sea Coastline, Alaska". Arctic. 61 (4): 361–372. doi:10.14430/arctic44. hdl:10535/5534. Archived from the original on 2013-05-17.
  27. ^ Montgomery, David R.; Stolar, Drew B. (1 December 2006). "Reconsidering Himalayan river anticlines". Geomorphology. 82 (1–2): 4–15. Bibcode:2006Geomo..82....4M. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.08.021.
  28. ^ Geddes, Ian. "Lithosphere". Higher geography for cfe: physical and human environments, Hodder Education, 2015.
  29. ^ Glynn, Peter W. "Bioerosion and coral-reef growth: a dynamic balance". Life and death of coral reefs (1997): 68–95.
  30. ^ Bell, Frederic Gladstone. "Marine action and control". Geological hazards: their assessment, avoidance, and mitigation, Taylor & Francis, 1999, pp. 302–306.
  31. ^ Pinter, N (2010). "Exercise 6 - Coastal Terraces, Sealevel, and Active Tectonics" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-10-10. Retrieved 2011-04-21.
  32. ^ Dixon, John C.; Thorn, Colin E. (2005). "Chemical weathering and landscape development in mid-latitude alpine environments". Geomorphology. 67 (1–2): 127–145. Bibcode:2005Geomo..67..127D. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.07.009.
  33. ^ Lard, L.; Paull, C.; Hobson, B. (1995). "Genesis of a submarine sinkhole without subaerial exposure". Geology. 23 (10): 949–951. Bibcode:1995Geo....23..949L. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0949:GOASSW>2.3.CO;2.
  34. ^ "The Devil's Nest, the deepest ground erosion in Europe".
  35. ^ Harbor, Jonathan M.; Hallet, Bernard; Raymond, Charles F. (1988-05-26). "A numerical model of landform development by glacial erosion". Nature. 333 (6171): 347–349. Bibcode:1988Natur.333..347H. doi:10.1038/333347a0. S2CID 4273817.
  36. ^ Egholm, D. L.; Nielsen, S. B.; Pedersen, V.K.; Lesemann, J.-E. (2009). "Glacial effects limiting mountain height". Nature. 460 (7257): 884–887. Bibcode:2009Natur.460..884E. doi:10.1038/nature08263. PMID 19675651. S2CID 205217746.
  37. ^ a b Thomson, Stuart N.; Brandon, Mark T.; Tomkin, Jonathan H.; Reiners, Peter W.; Vásquez, Cristián; Wilson, Nathaniel J. (2010). "Glaciation as a destructive and constructive control on mountain building". Nature. 467 (7313): 313–317. Bibcode:2010Natur.467..313T. doi:10.1038/nature09365. hdl:10533/144849. PMID 20844534. S2CID 205222252.
  38. ^ Tomkin, J.H.; Roe, G.H. (2007). "Climate and tectonic controls on glaciated critical-taper orogens" (PDF). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 262 (3–4): 385–397. Bibcode:2007E&PSL.262..385T. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.477.3927. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2007.07.040. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-09. Retrieved 2017-10-24.
  39. ^ Mitchell, S.G. & Montgomery, D.R. "Influence of a glacial buzzsaw on the height and morphology of the Cascade Range in central Washington State". Quat. Res. 65, 96–107 (2006)
  40. ^ Gjermundsen, Endre F.; Briner, Jason P.; Akçar, Naki; Foros, Jørn; Kubik, Peter W.; Salvigsen, Otto; Hormes, Anne (2015). "Minimal erosion of Arctic alpine topography during late Quaternary glaciation". Nature Geoscience. 8 (10): 789. Bibcode:2015NatGe...8..789G. doi:10.1038/ngeo2524.
  41. ^ Harvey, A.M. "Local-Scale geomorphology – process systems and landforms". Introducing Geomorphology: A Guide to Landforms and Processes. Dunedin Academic Press, 2012, pp. 87–88. EBSCOhost.
  42. ^ Prasicek, Günther; Larsen, Isaac J.; Montgomery, David R. (2015-08-14). "Tectonic control on the persistence of glacially sculpted topography". Nature Communications. 6: 8028. Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.8028P. doi:10.1038/ncomms9028. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 4557346. PMID 26271245.
  43. ^ See, for example: Alt, David (2001). Glacial Lake Missoula & its Humongous Floods. Mountain Press. ISBN 978-0-87842-415-3.
  44. ^ Zheng, Xiaojing; Huang, Ning (2009). Mechanics of Wind-Blown Sand Movements. Springer. pp. 7–8. Bibcode:2009mwbs.book.....Z. ISBN 978-3-540-88253-4.
  45. ^ Cornelis, Wim S. (2006). "Hydroclimatology of wind erosion in arid and semi-arid environments". In D'Odorico, Paolo; Porporato, Amilcare (eds.). Dryland Ecohydrology. Springer. p. 141. ISBN 978-1-4020-4261-4.
  46. ^ Blanco-Canqui, Humberto; Rattan, Lal (2008). "Wind erosion". Principles of soil conservation and management. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 54–80. ISBN 978-1-4020-8709-7.
  47. ^ Balba, A. Monem (1995). "Desertification: Wind erosion". Management of Problem Soils in Arid Ecosystems. CRC Press. p. 214. ISBN 978-0-87371-811-0.
  48. ^ Wiggs, Giles F.S. (2011). "Geomorphological hazards in drylands". In Thomas, David S.G. (ed.). Arid Zone Geomorphology: Process, Form and Change in Drylands. John Wiley & Sons. p. 588. ISBN 978-0-470-71076-0.
  49. ^ Van Beek, Rens (2008). "Hillside processes: mass wasting, slope stability, and erosion". In Norris, Joanne E.; et al. (eds.). Slope Stability and Erosion Control: Ecotechnological Solutions. Springer. Bibcode:2008ssec.conf.....N. ISBN 978-1-4020-6675-7.
  50. ^ Gray, Donald H.; Sotir, Robbin B. (1996). "Surficial erosion and mass movement". Biotechnical and Soil Bioengineering Slope Stabilization: A Practical Guide for Erosion Control. John Wiley & Sons. p. 20. ISBN 978-0-471-04978-4.
  51. ^ a b Nichols, Gary (2009). Sedimentology and Stratigraphy. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-9379-5.
  52. ^ Sivashanmugam, P. (2007). Basics of Environmental Science and Engineering. New India Publishing. pp. 43–. ISBN 978-81-89422-28-8.
  53. ^ "Britannica Library". library.eb.com. Retrieved 2017-01-31.
  54. ^ Halsey, Thomas C. (15 October 2018). "Erosion of unconsolidated beds by turbidity currents". Physical Review Fluids. 3 (10): 104303. Bibcode:2018PhRvF...3j4303H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.104303. S2CID 134740576.
  55. ^ Mitchell, Neil C. (October 2014). "Bedrock erosion by sedimentary flows in submarine canyons". Geosphere. 10 (5): 892–904. Bibcode:2014Geosp..10..892M. doi:10.1130/GES01008.1.
  56. ^ Smith, M. Elliot; Werner, Samuel H.; Buscombe, Daniel; Finnegan, Noah J.; Sumner, Esther J.; Mueller, Erich R. (28 November 2018). "Seeking the Shore: Evidence for Active Submarine Canyon Head Incision Due to Coarse Sediment Supply and Focusing of Wave Energy". Geophysical Research Letters. 45 (22): 12, 403–12, 413. Bibcode:2018GeoRL..4512403S. doi:10.1029/2018GL080396. S2CID 134823668.
  57. ^ Harris, Peter T. (2020). "Seafloor geomorphology—coast, shelf, and abyss". Seafloor Geomorphology as Benthic Habitat: 115–160. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-814960-7.00006-3. ISBN 9780128149607.
  58. ^ Bührig, Laura H.; Colombera, Luca; Patacci, Marco; Mountney, Nigel P.; McCaffrey, William D. (October 2022). "A global analysis of controls on submarine-canyon geomorphology". Earth-Science Reviews. 233: 104150. Bibcode:2022ESRv..23304150B. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.104150. S2CID 251576822.
  59. ^ Seafloor Geomorphology as Benthic Habitat. 2012. doi:10.1016/C2010-0-67010-6. ISBN 9780123851406. S2CID 213281574.
  60. ^ Zorn, Matija; Komac, Blaž (2013). "Erosivity". In Bobrowsky, Peter T. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer Netherlands. pp. 289–290. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_121. ISBN 978-90-481-8699-0.
  61. ^ a b Blanco-Canqui, Humberto; Rattan, Lal (2008). "Water erosion". Principles of soil conservation and management. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 21–53 [29–31]. ISBN 978-1-4020-8709-7.
  62. ^ Panagos, Panos; Ballabio, Cristiano; Himics, Mihaly; Scarpa, Simone; Matthews, Francis; Bogonos, Mariia; Poesen, Jean; Borrelli, Pasquale (2021-10-01). "Projections of soil loss by water erosion in Europe by 2050". Environmental Science & Policy. 124: 380–392. Bibcode:2021ESPol.124..380P. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.012. ISSN 1462-9011.
  63. ^ a b Montgomery, David R.; Huang, Michelle Y.-F.; Huang, Alice Y.-L. (2014-01-01). "Regional soil erosion in response to land use and increased typhoon frequency and intensity, Taiwan". Quaternary Research. 81 (1): 15–20. Bibcode:2014QuRes..81...15M. doi:10.1016/j.yqres.2013.10.005. ISSN 0033-5894. S2CID 53649150. Archived from the original on 2017-02-24. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
  64. ^ Gyssels, G.; Poesen, J.; Bochet, E.; Li, Y. (2005-06-01). "Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review". Progress in Physical Geography. 29 (2): 189–217. Bibcode:2005PrPG...29..189G. doi:10.1191/0309133305pp443ra. ISSN 0309-1333. S2CID 55243167.
  65. ^ Styczen, M.E.; Morgan, R.P.C. (1995). "Engineering properties of vegetation". In Morgan, R.P.C.; Rickson, R. Jane (eds.). Slope Stabilization and Erosion Control: A Bioengineering Approach. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-419-15630-7.
  66. ^ Whisenant, Steve G. (2008). "Terrestrial systems". In Perrow Michael R.; Davy, Anthony J. (eds.). Handbook of Ecological Restoration: Principles of Restoration. Cambridge University Press. p. 89. ISBN 978-0-521-04983-2.
  67. ^ Wainwright, John; Brazier, Richard E. (2011). "Slope systems". In Thomas, David S.G. (ed.). Arid Zone Geomorphology: Process, Form and Change in Drylands. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-71076-0.
  68. ^ Burbank, Douglas W.; Anderson, Robert S. (2011). "Tectonic and surface uplift rates". Tectonic Geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 270–271. ISBN 978-1-4443-4504-9.
  69. ^ Zeitler, P.K. et al. (2001), Erosion, Himalayan Geodynamics, and the Geomorphology of Metamorphism, GSA Today, 11, 4–9.
  70. ^ Chen, Jie (2007-01-16). "Rapid urbanization in China: A real challenge to soil protection and food security". CATENA. Influences of rapid urbanization and industrialization on soil resource and its quality in China. 69 (1): 1–15. Bibcode:2007Caten..69....1C. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2006.04.019.
  71. ^ Selby, Michael John (1985). Earth's changing surface: an introduction to geomorphology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-823252-7.
  72. ^ Pitman, W. C.; Golovchenko, X. (1991). "The effect of sea level changes on the morphology of mountain belts". Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 96 (B4): 6879–6891. Bibcode:1991JGR....96.6879P. doi:10.1029/91JB00250. ISSN 0148-0227.
  73. ^ Beckinsale, Robert P.; Chorley, Richard J. (2003) [1991]. "Chapter Seven: American Polycyclic Geomorphology". The History of the Study of Landforms. Vol. Three. Taylor & Francis e-Library. pp. 235–236.
  74. ^ Dewey, J.F.; Ryan, P.D.; Andersen, T.B. (1993). "Orogenic uplift and collapse, crustal thickness, fabrics and metamorphic phase changes: the role of eclogites". Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 76 (1): 325–343. Bibcode:1993GSLSP..76..325D. doi:10.1144/gsl.sp.1993.076.01.16. S2CID 55985869.
  75. ^ Orlov, S.Yu.; Kuznetsov, N.B.; Miller, E.D.; Soboleva, A.A.; Udoratina, O.V. (2011). "Age Constraints for the Pre-Uralide–Timanide Orogenic Event Inferred from the Study of Detrital Zircons". Doklady Earth Sciences. 440 (1): 1216–1221. Bibcode:2011DokES.440.1216O. doi:10.1134/s1028334x11090078. S2CID 128973374. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  76. ^ Lupia-Palmieri, Elvidio (2004). "Erosion". In Goudie, A.S. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Geomorphology. p. 336.
  77. ^ Alexander, Earl B. (2014). Soils in natural landscapes. CRC Press. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-4665-9436-4.
  78. ^ Blanco, Humberto; Lal, Rattan (2010). "Soil and water conservation". Principles of Soil Conservation and Management. Springer. p. 2. ISBN 978-90-481-8529-0.
  79. ^ "Farm and Commodity Policy: Glossary". United States Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original on 2 September 2011. Retrieved 17 July 2011.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Boardman, John; Poesen, Jean, eds. (2007). Soil Erosion in Europe. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-470-85911-7.
  • Montgomery, David (2008). Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations (1st ed.). University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-25806-8.
  • Montgomery, D.R. (8 August 2007). "Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (33): 13268–13272. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10413268M. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611508104. PMC 1948917. PMID 17686990.
  • Vanoni, Vito A., ed. (1975). "The nature of sedimentation problems". Sedimentation Engineering. ASCE Publications. ISBN 978-0-7844-0823-0.
  • Mainguet, Monique; Dumay, Frédéric (April 2011). Fighting wind erosion. One aspect of the combat against desertification. Les dossiers thématiques du CSFD. CSFD/Agropolis International. Archived from the original on 30 December 2020. Retrieved 7 October 2015.
[edit]
  • The Soil Erosion Site
  • International Erosion Control Association
  • Soil Erosion Data in the European Soil Portal
  • USDA National Soil Erosion Laboratory
  • The Soil and Water Conservation Society

 

 

Great Wall of China - Western Wall
Hadrian's Wall - Walls of Ston

A wall is a structure and a surface that defines an area; carries a load; provides security, shelter, or soundproofing; or, is decorative. There are many kinds of walls, including:

  • Border barriers between countries
  • Brick walls
  • Defensive walls in fortifications
  • Permanent, solid fences
  • Retaining walls, which hold back dirt, stone, water, or noise sound
  • Stone walls
  • Walls in buildings that form a fundamental part of the superstructure or separate interior rooms, sometimes for fire safety
  • Glass walls in which the primary structure is made of glass; does not include openings within walls that have glass coverings as these are windows
  • Walls that protect from oceans (seawalls) or rivers (levees)

Etymology

[edit]
"weall," an Old English word for 'wall'

The term wall comes from the Latin vallum meaning "an earthen wall or rampart set with palisades, a row or line of stakes, a wall, a rampart, fortification", while the Latin word murus means a defensive stone wall.[1] English uses the same word to mean an external wall and the internal sides of a room, but this is not universal. Many languages distinguish between the two. In German, some of this distinction can be seen between Wand and Mauer, in Spanish between pared and muro.

Defensive wall

[edit]

The word wall originally referred to defensive walls and ramparts.

Building wall

[edit]

The purposes of walls in buildings are to support roofs, floors and ceilings; to enclose a space as part of the building envelope along with a roof to give buildings form; and to provide shelter and security. In addition, the wall may house various types of utilities such as electrical wiring or plumbing. Wall construction falls into two basic categories: framed walls or mass-walls. In framed walls the load is transferred to the foundation through posts, columns or studs. Framed walls most often have three or more separate components: the structural elements (such as 2×4 studs in a house wall), insulation, and finish elements or surfaces (such as drywall or panelling). Mass-walls are of a solid material including masonry, concrete including slipform stonemasonry, log building, cordwood construction, adobe, rammed earth, cob, earthbag construction, bottles, tin cans, straw-bale construction, and ice. Walls may or may not be leadbearing. Walls are required to conform to the local building and/or fire codes.

There are three basic methods walls control water intrusion: moisture storage, drained cladding, or face-sealed cladding.[2] Moisture storage is typical of stone and brick mass-wall buildings where moisture is absorbed and released by the walls of the structure itself. Drained cladding also known as screened walls[3] acknowledges moisture will penetrate the cladding so a moisture barrier such as housewrap or felt paper inside the cladding provides a second line of defense and sometimes a drainage plane or air gap allows a path for the moisture to drain down through and exit the wall. Sometimes ventilation is provided in addition to the drainage plane such as in rainscreen construction. Face-sealed also called barrier wall or perfect barrier[3] cladding relies on maintaining a leak-free surface of the cladding. Examples of face sealed cladding are the early exterior insulation finishing systems, structural glazing, metal clad panels, and corrugated metal.

Building walls frequently become works of art, externally and internally, such as when featuring mosaic work or when murals are painted on them; or as design foci when they exhibit textures or painted finishes for effect.

Curtain wall

[edit]
Wall art in Budapest's Széll Kálmán Square.[4]
Glass curtain walls on a contemporary German skyscraper

In architecture and civil engineering, curtain wall refers to a building facade that is not load-bearing but provides decoration, finish, front, face, or historical preservation.

Precast wall

[edit]

Precast walls are walls which have been manufactured in a factory and then shipped to where it is needed, ready to install. It is faster to install compared to brick and other walls and may have a lower cost compared to other types of wall. Precast walls are cost effective compare to Brick Wall compound wall.

Mullion wall

[edit]

Mullion walls are a structural system that carries the load of the floor slab on prefabricated panels around the perimeter.

Partition wall

[edit]
Glass partition walls

A partition wall is a usually thin wall that is used to separate or divide a room, primarily a pre-existing one. Partition walls are usually not load-bearing, and can be constructed out of many materials, including steel panels, bricks, cloth, plastic, plasterboard, wood, blocks of clay, terracotta, concrete, and glass.

Some partition walls are made of sheet glass. Glass partition walls are a series of individual toughened glass panels mounted in wood or metal framing. They may be suspended from or slide along a robust aluminium ceiling track.[5] The system does not require the use of a floor guide, which allows easy operation and an uninterrupted threshold.

A timber partition consists of a wooden framework, supported on the floor or by side walls. Metal lath and plaster, properly laid, forms a reinforced partition wall. Partition walls constructed from fibre cement backer board are popular as bases for tiling in kitchens or in wet areas like bathrooms. Galvanized sheet fixed to wooden or steel members are mostly adopted in works of temporary character. Plain or reinforced partition walls may also be constructed from concrete, including pre-cast concrete blocks. Metal framed partitioning is also available. This partition consists of track (used primarily at the base and head of the partition) and studs (vertical sections fixed into the track typically spaced at 24", 16", or at 12").

Internal wall partitions, also known as office partitioning, are usually made of plasterboard (drywall) or varieties of glass. Toughened glass is a common option, as low-iron glass (better known as opti-white glass) increases light and solar heat transmission.

Wall partitions are constructed using beads and tracking that is either hung from the ceiling or fixed into the ground.[6] The panels are inserted into the tracking and fixed. Some wall partition variations specify their fire resistance and acoustic performance rating.

Movable partitions

Movable partitions are walls that open to join two or more rooms into one large floor area. These include:

  • Sliding—a series of panels that slide in tracks fixed to the floor and ceiling, similar sliding doors
  • Sliding and folding doors —similar to sliding folding doors, these are good for smaller spans
  • Folding partition walls - a series of interlocking panels suspended from an overhead track that when extended provide an acoustical separation, and when retracted stack against a wall, ceiling, closet, or ceiling pocket.
  • Screens—usually constructed of a metal or timber frame fixed with plywood and chipboard and supported with legs for free standing and easy movement
  • Pipe and drape—fixed or telescopic uprights and horizontals provide a ground supported drape system with removable panels.

Party wall

[edit]

Party walls are walls that separate buildings or units within a building. They provide fire resistance and sound resistance between occupants in a building. The minimum fire resistance and sound resistance required for the party wall is determined by a building code and may be modified to suit a variety of situations. Ownership of such walls can become a legal issue. It is not a load-bearing wall and may be owned by different people.

Infill wall

[edit]

An infill wall is the supported wall that closes the perimeter of a building constructed with a three-dimensional framework structure.

Fire wall

[edit]

Fire walls resist spread of fire within or sometimes between structures to provide passive fire protection. A delay in the spread of fire gives occupants more time to escape and fire fighters more time to extinguish the fire. Some fire walls allow fire resistive window assemblies,[7] and are made of non-combustible material such as concrete, cement block, brick, or fire rated drywall. Wall penetrations are sealed with fire resistive materials. A doorway in a firewall must have a rated fire door. Fire walls provide varying resistance to the spread of fire, (e.g., one, two, three or four hours). Firewalls can also act as smoke barriers when constructed vertically from slab to roof deck and horizontally from an exterior wall to exterior wall subdividing a building into sections.

Shear wall

[edit]

Shear walls resist lateral forces such as in an earthquake or severe wind. There are different kinds of shear walls such as the steel plate shear wall.

Knee wall

[edit]

Knee walls are short walls that either support rafters or add height in the top floor rooms of houses. In a 1+12-story house, the knee wall supports the half story.

Cavity wall

[edit]

Cavity walls are walls made with a space between two "skins" to inhibit heat transfer.

Pony wall

[edit]

Pony wall (or dwarf wall) is a general term for short walls, such as:

  • A half wall that only extends partway from floor to ceiling, without supporting anything
  • A stem wall—a concrete wall that extends from the foundation slab to the cripple wall or floor joists
  • A cripple wall—a framed wall from the stem wall or foundation slab to the floor joists

Demountable wall

[edit]
Demountable wall and door in an office building

Demountable walls fall into 3 different main types:

  • Glass walls (unitesed panels or butt joint),
  • Laminated particle board walls (this may also include other finishes, such as whiteboards, cork board, magnetic, etc., typically all on purpose-made wall studs)
  • Drywall

Solar energy

[edit]

A trombe wall in passive solar building design acts as a heat sink.

Shipbuilding

[edit]

On a ship, a wall that separates major compartments is called a bulkhead. A thinner wall between cabins is called a partition.

Boundary wall

[edit]
Stone wall of an English barn
A red bricks boundary wall intersection

Boundary walls include privacy walls, boundary-marking walls on property, and town walls. These intergrade into fences. The conventional differentiation is that a fence is of minimal thickness and often open in nature, while a wall is usually more than a nominal thickness and is completely closed, or opaque. More to the point, an exterior structure of wood or wire is generally called a fence—but one of masonry is a wall. A common term for both is barrier, which is convenient for structures that are partly wall and partly fence—for example the Berlin Wall. Another kind of wall-fence ambiguity is the ha-ha—which is set below ground level to protect a view, yet acts as a barrier (to cattle, for example).

An old Italian wall surrounded by flowers

Before the invention of artillery, many of the world's cities and towns, particularly in Europe and Asia, had defensive or protective walls (also called town walls or city walls). In fact, the English word "wall" derives from Latin vallum—a type of fortification wall. These walls are no longer relevant for defense, so such cities have grown beyond their walls, and many fortification walls, or portions of them, have been torn down—for example in Rome, Italy and Beijing, China. Examples of protective walls on a much larger scale include the Great Wall of China and Hadrian's Wall.

Border wall

[edit]
Berlin wall, July 1, 1988
Mexico–United States barrier in California

Some walls formally mark the border between one population and another. A border wall is constructed to limit the movement of people across a certain line or border. These structures vary in placement with regard to international borders and topography. The most famous example of border barrier in history is probably the Great Wall of China, a series of walls that separated the Empire of China from nomadic powers to the north. The most prominent recent example is the Berlin Wall, which surrounded the enclave of West Berlin and separated it from East Germany for most of the Cold War era. The US-Mexico border wall, separating the United States and Mexico, is another recent example.

Retaining wall

[edit]
Dry-stone wall - Grendon
Ashlar wall - Inca wall at Machu Picchu, Peru
View of the western enclosing wall of the Great Mosque of Kairouan (also called the Mosque of Uqba) in the city of Kairouan in Tunisia.

In areas of rocky soils around the world, farmers have often pulled large quantities of stone out of their fields to make farming easier and have stacked those stones to make walls that either mark the field boundary, or the property boundary, or both.

Retaining walls resist movement of earth, stone, or water. They may be part of a building or external. The ground surface or water on one side of a retaining wall is typically higher than on the other side. A dike is a retaining wall, as is a levee, a load-bearing foundation wall, and a sea wall.

Shared wall

[edit]

Special laws often govern walls that neighbouring properties share. Typically, one neighbour cannot alter the common wall if it is likely to affect the building or property on the other side. A wall may also separate apartment or hotel rooms from each other. Each wall has two sides and breaking a wall on one side will break the wall on the other side.

Portable wall

[edit]

Portable walls, such as room dividers or portable partitions divide a larger open space into smaller rooms. Portable walls can be static, such as cubicle walls, or can be wall panels mounted on casters to provide an easy way to reconfigure assembly space. They are often found inside schools, churches, convention centers, hotels, and corporate facilities.

Temporary wall

[edit]

A temporary wall is constructed for easy removal or demolition. A typical temporary wall can be constructed with 1⁄2" (6 mm) to 5⁄8" (16 mm) sheet rock (plasterboard), metal 2 × 3s (approx. 5 × 7 cm), or 2 × 4s, or taped, plastered and compounded. Most installation companies use lattice (strips of wood) to cover the joints of the temporary wall with the ceiling. These are sometimes known as pressurized walls or temporary pressurized walls.

[edit]

Walls are often seen in popular culture, oftentimes representing barriers preventing progress or entry. For example:

Fictional and symbolic walls

The progressive/psychedelic rock band Pink Floyd used a metaphorical wall to represent the isolation felt by the protagonist of their 1979 concept album The Wall.

The American poet laureate Robert Frost describes a pointless rock wall as a metaphor for the myopia of the culture-bound in his poem "Mending Wall", published in 1914.

Walls are a recurring symbol in Ursula K. Le Guin's 1974 novel The Dispossessed'.

In some cases, a wall may refer to an individual's debilitating mental or physical condition, seen as an impassable barrier.[citation needed]

In George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series and its television adaptation, Game of Thrones, The Wall plays multiple important roles: as a colossal fortification, made of ice and fortified with magic spells; as a cultural barrier; and as a codification of assumptions. Breaches of the wall, who is allowed to cross it and who is not, and its destruction have important symbolic, logistical, and socio-political implications in the storyline. Reportedly over 700 feet high and 100 leagues (300 miles) wide, it divides the northern border of the Seven Kingdoms realm from the domain of the wildlings and several categories of undead who live beyond it.[8][9][10]

Historical walls

In a real-life example, the Berlin Wall, constructed by the Soviet Union to divide Berlin into NATO and Warsaw Pact zones of occupation, became a worldwide symbol of oppression and isolation.[11]

Social media walls

Another common usage is as a communal surface to write upon. For instance the social networking site Facebook previously used an electronic "wall" to log the scrawls of friends until it was replaced by the "timeline" feature.

See also

[edit]
  • Ashlar
  • Chemise (wall)
  • Clay panel
  • Climbing wall
  • Crinkle crankle wall
  • Fabric structure
  • Great Green Wall (Africa)
  • Great Green Wall (China)
  • Green wall
  • List of walls
  • Sleeper wall
  • Stone wall
  • Tensile structure
  • Terraced wall
  • Thin-shell structure
  • Wallpaper

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Wall". Whitney, William Dwight, and Benjamin E. Smith. The Century dictionary and cyclopedia, vol. 8. New York: Century Co., 1901. 6,809. Print.
  2. ^ Committee on Damp Indoor Spaces and Health, Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Damp indoor spaces and health. Institute of Medicine, (U. S.). National Academies Press. Washington, D. C.. 2004. 34-35. Print.
  3. ^ a b Straube, J. F.and Burnett, E. F. P., "Driving Rain and Masonry Veneer". Water Leakage through Building Facades, ASTM STP 1314. R. J. Kudder and J. L. Erdly, Eds. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 1998. 75. Print.
  4. ^ Baróthy, Anna (2016). "Széll Kálmán square, Budapest, Hungary « Landscape Architecture Works". Landezine. Archived from the original on 2018-02-07. Retrieved 2018-02-07.
  5. ^ "PARTITION WALL". Principles of Design. Retrieved 17 July 2013.
  6. ^ "Partition Walls". Excellence in craftsmanship. Retrieved 17 July 2013.
  7. ^ NFPA 221 Standard for high Challenge Fire Walls, Fire Walls, and Fire Barrier Walls (2021 ed.). Table 4.9.2.
  8. ^ "Game of Thrones: Everything to Know About the Wall". Vulture. August 27, 2017.
  9. ^ "Game of Thrones Wall: How the Wall was built, and what its destruction means". Telegraph. April 15, 2019. Archived from the original on 2022-01-12.
  10. ^ "'Game of Thrones' Season 8: How Was The Wall Built?". Newsweek. April 7, 2019.
  11. ^ Preuss, Evelyn (2005). "The Wall You Will Never Know". Perspecta 036: The Yale Architectural Journal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 19–31.
[edit]

 

Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo
Photo

Things To Do in Cook County


Driving Directions in Cook County


Driving Directions From Alexian Brothers Behavioral: Powitz Jack N MD to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Bryan A. Bertoglio, MD to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From dr. Joanna Pozdal to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Red Roof PLUS+ Chicago - Hoffman Estates to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Schaumburg to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Navy Pier to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Navy Pier to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Navy Pier to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Navy Pier to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Navy Pier to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Navy Pier to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Reviews for United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc


United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Chris Abplanalp

(5)

USS did an amazing job on my underpinning on my house, they were also very courteous to the proximity of my property line next to my neighbor. They kept things in order with all the dirt/mud they had to excavate. They were done exactly in the timeframe they indicated, and the contract was very details oriented with drawings of what would be done. Only thing that would have been nice, is they left my concrete a little muddy with boot prints but again, all-in-all a great job

United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Jim de Leon

(5)

It was a pleasure to work with Rick and his crew. From the beginning, Rick listened to my concerns and what I wished to accomplish. Out of the 6 contractors that quoted the project, Rick seemed the MOST willing to accommodate my wishes. His pricing was definitely more than fair as well. I had 10 push piers installed to stabilize and lift an addition of my house. The project commenced at the date that Rick had disclosed initially and it was completed within the same time period expected (based on Rick's original assessment). The crew was well informed, courteous, and hard working. They were not loud (even while equipment was being utilized) and were well spoken. My neighbors were very impressed on how polite they were when they entered / exited my property (saying hello or good morning each day when they crossed paths). You can tell they care about the customer concerns. They ensured that the property would be put back as clean as possible by placing MANY sheets of plywood down prior to excavating. They compacted the dirt back in the holes extremely well to avoid large stock piles of soils. All the while, the main office was calling me to discuss updates and expectations of completion. They provided waivers of lien, certificates of insurance, properly acquired permits, and JULIE locates. From a construction background, I can tell you that I did not see any flaws in the way they operated and this an extremely professional company. The pictures attached show the push piers added to the foundation (pictures 1, 2 & 3), the amount of excavation (picture 4), and the restoration after dirt was placed back in the pits and compacted (pictures 5, 6 & 7). Please notice that they also sealed two large cracks and steel plated these cracks from expanding further (which you can see under my sliding glass door). I, as well as my wife, are extremely happy that we chose United Structural Systems for our contractor. I would happily tell any of my friends and family to use this contractor should the opportunity arise!

United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Paul Gunderlock

(4)

The staff was helpful, very nice and easy to work with and completed the work timely and cleaned up well. Communications faltered a bit at times and there was an email communications glitch which was no fault of anyone, but no big deal and all ended up fine. We sure feel better to have this done and hope that is the end of our structural issues. It does seem like (after talking to several related companies), that it would be great if some of these related companies had a structural engineer on staff vs using on the job expertise gained over years - which is definitely valuable! But leaves a bit of uncertainty - and probably saves money for both sides may be the trade-off? So far, so good though! Thank you.

United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Dave Kari

(5)

What a fantastic experience! Owner Rick Thomas is a trustworthy professional. Nick and the crew are hard working, knowledgeable and experienced. I interviewed every company in the area, big and small. A homeowner never wants to hear that they have foundation issues. Out of every company, I trusted USS the most, and it paid off in the end. Highly recommend.

View GBP

Frequently Asked Questions

Carbon fiber strips are used to reinforce foundation walls by being applied vertically over cracks. They provide additional tensile strength and stability to the wall, preventing further movement or widening of cracks. The strips are adhered using strong epoxy resin, effectively distributing load and reducing stress on the cracked areas.
Yes, carbon fiber strips can be a long-lasting solution when installed correctly. They offer high tensile strength and resistance to environmental factors like moisture and temperature changes. However, their effectiveness depends on proper installation and addressing any underlying causes of the crack, such as drainage issues or soil settlement.
Carbon fiber reinforcement is most effective for vertical or diagonal cracks in poured concrete foundations that are experiencing inward bowing due to lateral pressure from soil. It may not be suitable for severe structural damage or horizontal cracking, where more extensive repairs might be necessary. A professional assessment is recommended to determine the appropriate repair method based on specific conditions.